Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Waste Management v. New Hanover County, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Waste Management of Carolinas appealed the district court's denial of its motion for attorney's fees in a case against New Hanover County. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying attorney's fees. The facts and legal arguments were clear without need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Waste Management v. New Hanover County, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Waste Management of Carolinas appealed the district court's denial of its motion for attorney's fees in a case against New Hanover County. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying attorney's fees. The facts and legal arguments were clear without need for oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1042

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Waste Management of Carolinas appealed the district court's denial of its motion for attorney's fees in a case against New Hanover County. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying attorney's fees. The facts and legal arguments were clear without need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Waste Management v. New Hanover County, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Waste Management of Carolinas appealed the district court's denial of its motion for attorney's fees in a case against New Hanover County. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying attorney's fees. The facts and legal arguments were clear without need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1042

    WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CAROLINAS, INCORPORATED,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NEW HANOVER COUNTY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-93-113-7-BR)

    Submitted:

    October 13, 2004

    Decided:

    October 22, 2004

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Dixon Case, Jason Selig Thomas, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, L.L.P.,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    E. Holt Moore, III,
    Assistant County Attorney, Wilmington, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc., appeals the district
    courts order denying its motion for attorneys fees.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Waste

    Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. New Hanover County, No. CA-93-1137-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like