Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Reginald Boone appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and determined the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Reginald Boone appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and determined the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-09-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6380

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Reginald Boone appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and determined the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Reginald Boone appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and determined the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6380

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    REGINALD BOONE, a/k/a Reggie,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-002)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2010

    Decided:

    September 1, 2010

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Reginald Boone, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant United
    States
    Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Laura Marie Everhart,


    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Reginald

    Boone

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to


    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
    the motion.

    See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200

    (4th Cir. 2010).

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts

    order for the reasons stated there.

    See United States v. Boone,

    No. 2:92-cr-00113-002 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2010).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like