Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Clark v. Hinkle, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Michael Clark of a district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Clark's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7638

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Michael Clark of a district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Clark's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Clark v. Hinkle, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Michael Clark of a district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Clark's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7638

    MICHAEL CLARK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    G. M. HINKLE; MR. MITCHELL; LIEUTENANT LATNEY;
    J. GOLDEN, Major; MR. VALLOUR; CAPTAIN YATES;
    C. W. JOHNSON; MS. BUSWELL; MR. SPENCER; L. W.
    HUFFMAN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-96-1374)
    Submitted:

    May 15, 1997

    Decided:

    May 28, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Clark, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under
    28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Clark v. Hinkle, No. CA-96-1374 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like