Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Bromfield v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Joseph Edwin Bromfield's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, also denying Bromfield's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Bromfield v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Joseph Edwin Bromfield's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, also denying Bromfield's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6819

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Joseph Edwin Bromfield's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, also denying Bromfield's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Bromfield v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Joseph Edwin Bromfield's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, also denying Bromfield's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6819

    JOSEPH EDWIN BROMFIELD,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; TALMADGE L. BARNETT,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
    Judge. (CA-95-553-5-HC-BO)
    Submitted:

    March 31, 1997

    Decided:

    August 5, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joseph Edwin Bromfield, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994), amended
    by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.
    No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. Bromfield v. Freeman, No.
    CA-95-553-5-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 1996). We deny Appellant's
    motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like