Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ahmed v. Mukasey, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Mian Taugir Ahmed, a native of Pakistan, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Ahmed's claims and the record and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. The court denied the petition for review, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without requiring oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-05-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1933

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mian Taugir Ahmed, a native of Pakistan, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Ahmed's claims and the record and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. The court denied the petition for review, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Ahmed v. Mukasey, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mian Taugir Ahmed, a native of Pakistan, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Ahmed's claims and the record and concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. The court denied the petition for review, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1933

    MIAN TAUGIR AHMED,


    Petitioner,
    v.
    MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals.

    Submitted:

    May 14, 2008

    Decided:

    May 22, 2008

    Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.


    Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Senior
    Litigation Counsel, Arthur L. Rabin, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mian Taugir Ahmed, a native and citizen of Pakistan,
    seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
    (Board) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.

    We have

    reviewed the record and Ahmeds claims and conclude that the Board
    did not abuse its discretion in denying Ahmeds motion.

    See 8

    C.F.R. 1003.2(a), (c)(1) (2008).


    We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like