Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Akinro v. Avis Car Rental, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's order dismissing his civil complaint against Avis Car Rental. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Akinro's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court also denied Akinro's request for oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Akinro v. Avis Car Rental, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's order dismissing his civil complaint against Avis Car Rental. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Akinro's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court also denied Akinro's request for oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-1631

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's order dismissing his civil complaint against Avis Car Rental. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Akinro's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court also denied Akinro's request for oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Akinro v. Avis Car Rental, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Francis Akinro appealed a district court's order dismissing his civil complaint against Avis Car Rental. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing Akinro's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court also denied Akinro's request for oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-1631

    FRANCIS AKINRO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    AVIS CAR RENTAL, et al.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
    (1:10-cv-01300-BEL)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 2010

    Decided:

    September 30, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Francis

    Akinro

    appeals

    dismissing his civil complaint.


    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    we

    grant

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by


    the

    district

    court.

    Akinro

    v.

    Avis

    1:10-cv-01300-BEL (D. Md. May 25, 2010).

    Car

    Rental,

    No.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like