Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    United States v. Kimberlin, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frankie Edward Kimberlin, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in United States v. Kimberlin, Nos. CR-92-178-G; CA-97-725-1 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Kimberlin, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Frankie Edward Kimberlin, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in United States v. Kimberlin, Nos. CR-92-178-G; CA-97-725-1 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6939

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frankie Edward Kimberlin, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in United States v. Kimberlin, Nos. CR-92-178-G; CA-97-725-1 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Kimberlin, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frankie Edward Kimberlin, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in United States v. Kimberlin, Nos. CR-92-178-G; CA-97-725-1 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6939

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    FRANKIE EDWARD KIMBERLIN, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
    District Judge. (CR-92-178-G, CA-97-725-1)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 1998

    Decided:

    October 26, 1998

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Frankie Edward Kimberlin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    United States v. Kimberlin, Nos. CR-92-178-G; CA-97-725-1 (M.D.N.C.
    May 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like