Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Tapia-Santana, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Tapia-Santana did not present grounds to vacate his sentence or alter the judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Tapia-Santana, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Tapia-Santana did not present grounds to vacate his sentence or alter the judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7584

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Tapia-Santana did not present grounds to vacate his sentence or alter the judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Tapia-Santana, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Tapia-Santana did not present grounds to vacate his sentence or alter the judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7584

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LAZARO TAPIA-SANTANA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-62-BR, CA-00-864-BR)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2001

    Decided:

    January 9, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lazaro Tapia-Santana, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jolly, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lazaro Tapia-Santana seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    Supp. 2001) and his motion to alter or amend judgment.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts orders and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

    ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    United States v. Tapia-Santana, Nos. CR-93-62-BR; CA-00-

    864-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2001; Feb. 5, 2001).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like