Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. Beeler, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Grant Anderson, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief and Anderson appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of Anderson's petition for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-07-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6703

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Grant Anderson, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief and Anderson appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of Anderson's petition for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Anderson v. Beeler, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Grant Anderson, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his detention. The district court denied relief and Anderson appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of Anderson's petition for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6703

    GRANT ANDERSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    A. F. BEELER,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-837-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    July 10, 2003

    Decided:

    July 17, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Grant Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant


    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Grant Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (2000).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Anderson v. Beeler, No. CA-02-837-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2,


    2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like