Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Robinson v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Brent Robinson appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case, as stated in its March 23, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Robinson v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Brent Robinson appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case, as stated in its March 23, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6555

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Brent Robinson appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case, as stated in its March 23, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Robinson v. State of NC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Brent Robinson appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against the State of North Carolina and Rick Jackson. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case, as stated in its March 23, 2006 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6555

    BRENT A. ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-000132)

    Submitted: May 18, 2006

    Decided: June 1, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Brent A. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Brent A. Robinson appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil action filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000).
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See

    Robinson

    v.

    (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2006).

    North

    Carolina,

    No.

    3:06-cv-000132

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like