Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Shuler v. Vaughn, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 15, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Shuler v. Vaughn, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 15, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6228

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 15, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Shuler v. Vaughn, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 15, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6228

    CURTIS D. SHULER,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN N. VAUGHN,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:08-ct-03088-BO)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2010

    Decided:

    August 5, 2010

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant


    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    Appellee.

    Pro Se.
    Raleigh,

    James Philip Allen,


    North
    Carolina,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Shuler v. Vaughn, No. 5:08-ct-03088-BO (E.D.N.C.

    Jan. 15,

    2010).

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We

    dispense

    contentions
    the

    court

    with

    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like