Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jones v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Charles Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6158

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Charles Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Jones v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Charles Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6158

    CHARLES JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones,


    a/k/a Jeffrey Victor Warner,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ARRIE W. DAVIS, Judge; ROBERT M. BELL, Chief
    Judge; BALTIMORE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA03-3526-RDB)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 2004

    Decided:

    April 2, 2004

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Jones appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    No. CA-03-3526-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 17, 2003).

    We have reviewed

    See Jones v. Davis,

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like