Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Coffey v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Charles Coffey, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Coffey relief for the reasons stated in its April 18, 2006 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6882

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Coffey, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Coffey relief for the reasons stated in its April 18, 2006 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Coffey v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Coffey, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Coffey relief for the reasons stated in its April 18, 2006 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6882

    CHARLES EDWARD COFFEY,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise M. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:06-hc-02047-FL)

    Submitted: September 26, 2006

    Decided: October 2, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Edward Coffey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Edward Coffey, a federal prisoner,

    appeals the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2000)

    petition.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Coffey v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02047-FL

    (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like