Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jack v. Dawson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Todd M. Jack's action against President Cutler Dawson. The district court had dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), which allows dismissal if the action fails to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-02-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1628

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Todd M. Jack's action against President Cutler Dawson. The district court had dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), which allows dismissal if the action fails to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Jack v. Dawson, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Todd M. Jack's action against President Cutler Dawson. The district court had dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), which allows dismissal if the action fails to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1628

    TODD M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    PRESIDENT CUTLER DAWSON,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District
    Judge. (5:09-cv-00032-gec)

    Submitted:

    January 20, 2010

    Decided:

    February 3, 2010

    Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Todd

    M.

    Jack

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)


    (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Jack v. Dawson, No. 5:09-cv-00032-gec (W.D. Va.

    May 20, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like