Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tunstall v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Charles Tunstall, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Tunstall appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Tunstall on his § 1983 complaint against prison officials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6560

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Tunstall, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Tunstall appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Tunstall on his § 1983 complaint against prison officials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Tunstall v. Freeman, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Tunstall, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Tunstall appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Tunstall on his § 1983 complaint against prison officials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6560

    CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANKLIN
    FREEMAN;
    CHARLES
    CASTELLO; SERGEANT GATLING,

    CREECY;

    TOMMY
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-97-45-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 1998

    Decided:

    August 26, 1998

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley,
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Tunstall v. Freeman, No. CA-97-45-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
    Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like