Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7964

JAMES GUY ARNOLD,


Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SHERIFF MADES; MARTIN VAN EVANS, Lieutenant,
Warden,
Respondents - Appellees.

No. 01-8094

JAMES GUY ARNOLD,


Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES MADES; MARTIN VAN EVANS; WASHINGTON
COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND; M. KENNETH LONG,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-012347-AMD, CA-01-3087-AMD)

Submitted:

February 21, 2002

Decided:

March 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


James Guy Arnold, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
James Guy Arnold appeals the district courts order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition in these consolidated cases.

We have reviewed the record and the district courts

opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the


district court.

See Arnold v. Mades, Nos. CA-01-2347-AMD & CA-01-

3087-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 2 & 6, 2001 and filed Nov. 27; entered Nov.
29, 2001).

We deny Arnolds motion for emergency action in No. 01-

7964 and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

You might also like