Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Langdon v. Garner, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order imposing a prefiling injunction on Christopher Langdon. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It denied Langdon's motions to file a response, for appointment of counsel, and for oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-02-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1649

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order imposing a prefiling injunction on Christopher Langdon. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It denied Langdon's motions to file a response, for appointment of counsel, and for oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Langdon v. Garner, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order imposing a prefiling injunction on Christopher Langdon. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It denied Langdon's motions to file a response, for appointment of counsel, and for oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1649

    CHRISTOPHER LANGDON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus

    ED GARNER, JR.; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ROY


    COOPER; T. L. MALONEE; PHILLIP JACKSON;
    BERNADINE BALLANCE; NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL
    COMMISSION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-01-746-5-BO; CA-01-816-5-BO; CA-01-906-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    December 29, 2003

    Decided:

    February 10, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher Langdon, Appellant Pro Se.


    Adrian Phillips, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Robert Orr Crawford, III, Lisa
    Carol Glover, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher Langdon appeals from the district courts
    order imposing a prefiling injunction.
    discloses no reversible error.

    Our review of the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See Langdon v. Garner, Nos.

    CA-01-746-5-BO, CA-01-816-5-BO, CA-01-906-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 17,


    2003). We grant Langdons motion to amend his informal brief, deny
    his motion for stay pending appeal, deny Langdons motions for an
    extension to file a response, for appointment of counsel and oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like