Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Bryson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William M. Bryson Jr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for the return of property. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the panel affirmed the district court's order denying the return of Bryson's property based on precedent that a district court does not err when it denies a motion for return of property no longer in possession of the government. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Bryson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William M. Bryson Jr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for the return of property. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the panel affirmed the district court's order denying the return of Bryson's property based on precedent that a district court does not err when it denies a motion for return of property no longer in possession of the government. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7796

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William M. Bryson Jr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for the return of property. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the panel affirmed the district court's order denying the return of Bryson's property based on precedent that a district court does not err when it denies a motion for return of property no longer in possession of the government. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Bryson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William M. Bryson Jr.'s appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for the return of property. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the panel affirmed the district court's order denying the return of Bryson's property based on precedent that a district court does not err when it denies a motion for return of property no longer in possession of the government. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7796

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-01-240)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 2004

    Decided:

    March 31, 2004

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra
    Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district courts
    order denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R.
    Crim. P. 41.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts order.

    Floyd v. United States, 860 F.2d 999, 1003 (10th Cir. 1988).

    See
    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like