Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    In Re: Bullock V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vernon Bullock filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had recently dismissed Bullock's § 2241 petition. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now decided the case. The court also granted Bullock leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Bullock V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Vernon Bullock filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had recently dismissed Bullock's § 2241 petition. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now decided the case. The court also granted Bullock leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6690

    Original Title

    In Re: Bullock v., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vernon Bullock filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had recently dismissed Bullock's § 2241 petition. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now decided the case. The court also granted Bullock leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    In Re: Bullock V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vernon Bullock filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had recently dismissed Bullock's § 2241 petition. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now decided the case. The court also granted Bullock leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6690

    In Re:

    VERNON BULLOCK,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    July 29, 2004

    (CA-03-280-5)

    Decided:

    August 5, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Vernon Bullock, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Vernon Bullock petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging
    the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (2000) case.

    He seeks an order from this court directing

    the district court to act.

    Our review of the docket sheet reveals

    that the district court has dismissed Bullocks 2241 petition.


    Because the district court has recently decided Bullocks case, we
    deny the mandamus petition as moot.
    forma pauperis.

    We grant leave to proceed in

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like