Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Warren Reginald Stevenson v. Suzanne Mensh, Clerk William Hill, Deputy Clerk, 989 F.2d 494, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    An inmate filed a Section 1983 claim against court clerks which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without oral argument, finding no abuse of discretion and that the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit's per curiam opinion adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying both the inmate's request to amend his complaint and any relief under Section 1983.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-03-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 989 F.2d 494 Docket: 93-6083

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    An inmate filed a Section 1983 claim against court clerks which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without oral argument, finding no abuse of discretion and that the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit's per curiam opinion adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying both the inmate's request to amend his complaint and any relief under Section 1983.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Warren Reginald Stevenson v. Suzanne Mensh, Clerk William Hill, Deputy Clerk, 989 F.2d 494, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    An inmate filed a Section 1983 claim against court clerks which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without oral argument, finding no abuse of discretion and that the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit's per curiam opinion adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying both the inmate's request to amend his complaint and any relief under Section 1983.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    989 F.

    2d 494

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Warren Reginald STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Suzanne MENSH, Clerk; William Hill, Deputy Clerk,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 93-6083.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 1, 1993
    Decided: March 26, 1993

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-92-516-MJG)
    Warren Reginald Stevenson, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Warren Reginald Stevenson, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's


    order denying him leave to amend his complaint and denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stevenson v.


    Mensh, No. CA-92-516MJG (D. Md. Dec. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like