Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Jamison v. Whittleton, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Jamison's request for reimbursement of the filing fee he paid for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jamison v. Whittleton, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Jamison's request for reimbursement of the filing fee he paid for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-05-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7206

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Jamison's request for reimbursement of the filing fee he paid for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Jamison v. Whittleton, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Jamison's request for reimbursement of the filing fee he paid for his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7206

    KEVIN JAMISON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    NFN WHITTLETON, Captain; NFN WALTERS, Officer; NFN HAYWOOD,
    Sergeant; EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (9:06-cv-03462-SB)

    Submitted:

    April 14, 2008

    Decided:

    May 6, 2008

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin Jamison, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Jamison appeals the district courts order denying
    his request for reimbursement of the filing fee paid for his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Jamison v. Whittleton, No. 9:06-cv-

    03462-SB (D.S.C. July 20, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like