Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Louis Golding v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 360 F.2d 611, 4th Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security benefits to Louis Golding. The court found that the record contained no substantial evidence to rebut the presumption against coverage arising from the absence of any record of self-employed earnings during the relevant period. As the administrative determination and district court's affirmance appeared plainly correct based on the lack of evidence, the court affirmed the denial of benefits to Golding.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1966-05-03 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 360 F.2d 611 Docket: 10287_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security benefits to Louis Golding. The court found that the record contained no substantial evidence to rebut the presumption against coverage arising from the absence of any record of self-employed earnings during the relevant period. As the administrative determination and district court's affirmance appeared plainly correct based on the lack of evidence, the court affirmed the denial of benefits to Golding.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views1 page

    Louis Golding v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 360 F.2d 611, 4th Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of Social Security benefits to Louis Golding. The court found that the record contained no substantial evidence to rebut the presumption against coverage arising from the absence of any record of self-employed earnings during the relevant period. As the administrative determination and district court's affirmance appeared plainly correct based on the lack of evidence, the court affirmed the denial of benefits to Golding.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    360 F.

    2d 611

    Louis GOLDING, Appellant,


    v.
    Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education
    and Welfare, Appellee.
    No. 10287.

    United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.


    Argued April 8, 1966.
    Decided May 3, 1966.

    Louis Golding, appellant, pro se.


    H. Marshall Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty.,
    on brief), for appellee.
    Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, and
    BARKSDALE, District Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    This claimant for Social Security benefits appeals from an adverse


    determination that he had not established coverage under the Act during the
    relevant period. Since the record is devoid of any substantial evidence
    controverting the presumption which naturally derives from the absence of any
    record of self-employed earnings, the administrative determination and its
    affirmance by the District Court seem plainly correct.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like