Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Michael Howze, 61 F.3d 901, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on a motion filed by Michael Howze pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Howze's motion and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-07-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 61 F.3d 901 Docket: 95-6628

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on a motion filed by Michael Howze pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Howze's motion and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views1 page

    United States v. Michael Howze, 61 F.3d 901, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on a motion filed by Michael Howze pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Howze's motion and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    61 F.

    3d 901

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
    v.
    Michael HOWZE, Defendant--Appellant.
    No. 95-6628.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 22, 1995.
    Decided July 18, 1995.

    Michael Howze, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Asst. U.S.
    Atty., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion pursuant to
    18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c)(2) (West Supp.1995). We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Howze, No. CR94-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like