Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wright v. Hawk, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Samuel Wright appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6086

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Samuel Wright appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Wright v. Hawk, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Samuel Wright appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6086

    SAMUEL WRIGHT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KATHY HAWK, Director, United States Bureau of
    Prisons; JOHN DOE, Superintendent, Northern
    Neck Regional Jail,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CA-00-232)

    Submitted:

    March 8, 2001

    Decided:

    March 16, 2001

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Samuel Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Samuel Wright appeals the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.
    Dec. 20, 2000).

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See Wright v. Hawk, No. CA-00-232 (E.D. Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like