Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Dehoney v. Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes three appeals cases from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation to construe habeas corpus petitions from Michael F. Dehoney and Henry F. Dehoney under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 instead of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court then dismissed the complaints and denied a motion to reconsider. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in its acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation or its dismissal of the complaints.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Dehoney v. Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views3 pages
    This document summarizes three appeals cases from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation to construe habeas corpus petitions from Michael F. Dehoney and Henry F. Dehoney under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 instead of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court then dismissed the complaints and denied a motion to reconsider. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in its acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation or its dismissal of the complaints.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7534

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes three appeals cases from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation to construe habeas corpus petitions from Michael F. Dehoney and Henry F. Dehoney under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 instead of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court then dismissed the complaints and denied a motion to reconsider. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in its acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation or its dismissal of the complaints.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views3 pages

    Dehoney v. Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes three appeals cases from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation to construe habeas corpus petitions from Michael F. Dehoney and Henry F. Dehoney under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 instead of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court then dismissed the complaints and denied a motion to reconsider. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in its acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation or its dismissal of the complaints.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7534

    MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER,
    Attorney General of South Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    No. 05-7535

    MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER,
    Attorney General of South Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    No. 05-7536

    HENRY F. DEHONEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER,
    Attorney General of South Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge.
    (CA-04-21981-HMH-BHH;
    CA-04-22025-HMH-BHH;
    CA-04-22026-HMH-BMH)

    Submitted: April 27, 2006

    Decided: May 3, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Barton Jon Vincent, DAVIDSON,


    MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael F. Dehoney appeals the district courts order
    accepting the magistrate judges recommendation and construing his
    28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000) petition under 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West
    Supp. 2000) and dismissing the complaint and the order denying his
    motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district
    courts opinions and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Dehoney v.

    Ozmint,

    Nos.

    CA-04-21981-HMH-BHH;

    CA-04-22025-HMH-BHH;

    CA-04-22026-HMH-BMH (D.S.C. Aug. 10 & 29, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like