Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against McCormick Correctional Institution and several officials. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Washington appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    William Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against McCormick Correctional Institution and several officials. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Washington appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-06-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7697

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against McCormick Correctional Institution and several officials. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Washington appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Washington v. McCormick Correctional Institution, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against McCormick Correctional Institution and several officials. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Washington appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7697

    WILLIAM WASHINGTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; COLLIE RUSHTON, Warden;
    C.E. PRATT, Lieutenant; A. WRIGHT, Sgt.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (0:07-cv-00026)

    Submitted:

    February 20, 2008

    Decided:

    June 11, 2008

    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Washington, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE,


    OROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, P.A., Anderson, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William Washington appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Washington v.

    McCormick Corr. Inst., No. 0:07-cv-00026 (D.S.C. Oct. 16, 2007).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like