Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Police Department, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the complaint as stated in its January 29, 2010 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Police Department, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the complaint as stated in its January 29, 2010 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6312

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the complaint as stated in its January 29, 2010 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Police Department, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Christopher Odom on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the complaint as stated in its January 29, 2010 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Certiorari dismissed, November 15, 2010

    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6312

    CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    MT. PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER;
    TOWN OF MT. PLEASANT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; WAL-MART
    INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL INSURANCE
    POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE POLICY
    HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF SOUTH
    CAROLINA MEDICAL INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STATE OF SOUTH
    CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
    District Judge. (3:09-cv-01941-PMD)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 2010

    Decided:

    August 2, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher A. Odom appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Odom v.

    Mt.

    (D.S.C.

    Pleasant

    Jan. 29,
    facts

    2010).

    and

    materials

    Police

    legal
    before

    We

    Dept,

    No.

    dispense

    with

    contentions
    the

    court

    3:09-cv-01941-PMD
    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like