Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hall v. Prison Health Services, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Anthony Hall under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Prison Health Services and a doctor. The district court denied relief to Hall and the appellate court affirmed that decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-12-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7708

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Anthony Hall under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Prison Health Services and a doctor. The district court denied relief to Hall and the appellate court affirmed that decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Hall v. Prison Health Services, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Anthony Hall under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Prison Health Services and a doctor. The district court denied relief to Hall and the appellate court affirmed that decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7708

    ANTHONY HALL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, Medical Provider for
    Sussex
    II
    State
    Prison;
    DOCTOR
    ULEP,
    Institutional Physician,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (2:05-cv-00177-RGD)

    Submitted:

    November 22, 2006

    Decided:

    December 14, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS


    & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Hall appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Hall v. Prison

    Health Servs., No. 2:05-cv-00177-RGD (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2006). We


    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like