Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    In Re: Woodard V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Johnny and Carolyn Woodard filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court dismissed their case and the district court denied their motion to stay the dismissal. The Woodards appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the Woodards' motion for a transcript to be prepared at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Woodard V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Johnny and Carolyn Woodard filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court dismissed their case and the district court denied their motion to stay the dismissal. The Woodards appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the Woodards' motion for a transcript to be prepared at government expense.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-2204

    Original Title

    In Re: Woodard v., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Johnny and Carolyn Woodard filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court dismissed their case and the district court denied their motion to stay the dismissal. The Woodards appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the Woodards' motion for a transcript to be prepared at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    In Re: Woodard V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Johnny and Carolyn Woodard filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court dismissed their case and the district court denied their motion to stay the dismissal. The Woodards appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied the Woodards' motion for a transcript to be prepared at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-2204

    In Re:
    In Re:

    JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.;


    CAROLYN J. WOODARD,
    Debtors.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; CAROLYN J. WOODARD,


    Appellants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:06-mc-00025; 04-04082-8-JRL)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2007

    Decided:

    April 2, 2007

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Johnny Woodard, Jr., Carolyn J. Woodard, Appellants Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Johnny Woodard, Jr. and Carolyn J. Woodard appeal the
    district

    courts

    order

    denying

    their

    motion

    for

    stay

    of

    the

    bankruptcy courts order dismissing their Chapter 13 proceeding.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. In re: Woodard, Nos. 5:06-mc-0025; 04-04082-8-JRL (E.D.N.C.
    Nov. 7, 2006).

    We deny the motion for preparation of a transcript

    at government expense.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like