Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carl v. Lamb v. Union Carbide Corporation, 14 F.3d 595, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Carl Lamb sued Union Carbide Corporation for tortious interference with contract, libel, and slander. The district court dismissed Lamb's complaint, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Lamb's appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also dismissed as moot Lamb's motion to expedite the determination of his appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-12-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 14 F.3d 595 Docket: 92-1840

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carl Lamb sued Union Carbide Corporation for tortious interference with contract, libel, and slander. The district court dismissed Lamb's complaint, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Lamb's appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also dismissed as moot Lamb's motion to expedite the determination of his appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Carl v. Lamb v. Union Carbide Corporation, 14 F.3d 595, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carl Lamb sued Union Carbide Corporation for tortious interference with contract, libel, and slander. The district court dismissed Lamb's complaint, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Lamb's appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also dismissed as moot Lamb's motion to expedite the determination of his appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    14 F.

    3d 595

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Carl V. LAMB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 92-1840.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Dec. 8, 1993.
    1

    Gary Wayne Hart, Charleston, WV.

    Anthony J. Majestro, Charleston, WV.

    S.D.W.Va.

    AFFIRMED.
    PER CURIAM

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint
    alleging tortious interference with contract, libel, and slander. Our review of the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the
    magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Lamb v. Union Carbide Corp, No.
    CA-91-1049-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    Lamb's motion to expedite the determination of his appeal is now moot and is
    dismissed for that reason

    You might also like