Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Mabine v. Ambrogi, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2002. Sidney Mabine filed a § 1983 complaint against a Commonwealth's Attorney and public defender which was denied by the district court. Mabine appealed the district court's denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in denying Mabine's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Mabine v. Ambrogi, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2002. Sidney Mabine filed a § 1983 complaint against a Commonwealth's Attorney and public defender which was denied by the district court. Mabine appealed the district court's denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in denying Mabine's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-02-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7858

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2002. Sidney Mabine filed a § 1983 complaint against a Commonwealth's Attorney and public defender which was denied by the district court. Mabine appealed the district court's denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in denying Mabine's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Mabine v. Ambrogi, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2002. Sidney Mabine filed a § 1983 complaint against a Commonwealth's Attorney and public defender which was denied by the district court. Mabine appealed the district court's denial. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in denying Mabine's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7858

    SIDNEY MABINE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LAWRENCE AMBROGI, Commonwealths
    LUKE BOYD, Public Defender,

    Attorney;
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-02-1061)

    Submitted:

    February 6, 2003

    Decided:

    February 13, 2003

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sidney Mabine, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sidney Mabine appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court. See Mabine v. Ambrogi, No. CA02-1061 (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like