Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stacy Orlando Parham v. Willie Challis Frank Bega, 72 F.3d 127, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    Stacy Orlando Parham filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Willie Challis and Frank Bega that was denied by the magistrate judge. Parham appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-12-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 72 F.3d 127 Docket: 95-6709

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stacy Orlando Parham filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Willie Challis and Frank Bega that was denied by the magistrate judge. Parham appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views1 page

    Stacy Orlando Parham v. Willie Challis Frank Bega, 72 F.3d 127, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stacy Orlando Parham filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Willie Challis and Frank Bega that was denied by the magistrate judge. Parham appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's decision, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    72 F.

    3d 127
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Stacy Orlando PARHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Willie CHALLIS; Frank Bega, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6709.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 21, 1995.
    Decided Dec. 14, 1995.

    Stacy Orlando Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III,
    SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & RAWLS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The parties consented to the magistrate
    judge's jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the magistrate judge. Parham v. Challis, No. CA-94-371 (E.D.Va. Apr. 21,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like