Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Willie Edwin Newkirk, 107 F.3d 868, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The appellant sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and his motion for correction or reduction of sentence under Rule 35(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Willie Edwin Newkirk, 107 F.3d 868, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The appellant sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and his motion for correction or reduction of sentence under Rule 35(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 107 F.3d 868 Docket: 96-7432

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The appellant sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and his motion for correction or reduction of sentence under Rule 35(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Willie Edwin Newkirk, 107 F.3d 868, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The appellant sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and his motion for correction or reduction of sentence under Rule 35(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    107 F.

    3d 868

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Willie Edwin NEWKIRK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 96-7432.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
    Decided Feb. 26, 1997.

    Willie Edwin Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed
    under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death
    Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and his motion for
    correction or reduction of sentence filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Newkirk, Nos.
    CR-94-300; CA-95-1581-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like