Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tracy Peterson, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Tracy Peterson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Peterson's motion for the reasons stated in United States v. Peterson. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7932

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tracy Peterson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Peterson's motion for the reasons stated in United States v. Peterson. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Tracy Peterson, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tracy Peterson appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Peterson's motion for the reasons stated in United States v. Peterson. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7932

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TRACY PETERSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:04-cr-00167-BO-4; 5:12-cv-00270-BO)

    Submitted:

    April 18, 2013

    Decided: April 22, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tracy Peterson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jennifer P. May-Parker,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tracy
    denying

    relief

    motion.
    error.

    Peterson
    on

    his

    appeals

    28

    the

    U.S.C.A.

    district
    2255

    courts

    (West

    Supp.

    order
    2012)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly,

    district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    United States v. Peterson, Nos. 5:04-cr-00167-

    BO-4; 5:12-cv-00270-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2012).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like