Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Francina Maria Davis appealed the district court's denial of her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Davis a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Davis was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-05-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7613

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Francina Maria Davis appealed the district court's denial of her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Davis a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Davis was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Francina Maria Davis appealed the district court's denial of her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Davis a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Davis was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7613

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    FRANCINA MARIA DAVIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-89-68, CA-99-3094-7-20)

    Submitted:

    May 11, 2000

    Decided:

    May 17, 2000

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Francina Maria Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Francina Maria Davis seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court. See United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-89-68; CA99-3094-7-20 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 1999).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like