Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Horton v. Martin, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from John D. Horton of a district court order. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Horton's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous order dismissing Horton's civil action. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1455

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from John D. Horton of a district court order. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Horton's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous order dismissing Horton's civil action. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Horton v. Martin, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from John D. Horton of a district court order. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Horton's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous order dismissing Horton's civil action. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1455

    JOHN D. HORTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES ANTHONY MARTIN; MATTHEW COAKLEY; WILLIAM
    WEBB, Honorable; ANNE HAYES; MALCOLM J.
    HOWARD, Honorable; GEOFFREY HOSFORD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (CA-04-976)

    Submitted:

    August 25, 2005

    Decided:

    August 31, 2005

    Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John D. Horton, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John

    D.

    Horton

    appeals

    dismissing his civil action.

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the record and find

    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Horton v.

    Martin, No. CA-04-976 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like