Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Garnell Steven Hill v. Captain J. Houck, (West Compound), 963 F.2d 367, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Garnell Steven Hill, appealing the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a defendant, Captain J. Houck. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Garnell Steven Hill v. Captain J. Houck, (West Compound), 963 F.2d 367, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Garnell Steven Hill, appealing the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a defendant, Captain J. Houck. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-05-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 963 F.2d 367 Docket: 90-7505

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Garnell Steven Hill, appealing the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a defendant, Captain J. Houck. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Garnell Steven Hill v. Captain J. Houck, (West Compound), 963 F.2d 367, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Garnell Steven Hill, appealing the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a defendant, Captain J. Houck. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    963 F.

    2d 367

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Garnell Steven HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Captain J. HOUCK, (West Compound), Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-7505.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 13, 1992
    Decided: May 26, 1992

    Garnell Steven Hill, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.
    Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Garnell Steven Hill appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Houck, No. CA-89-926-B (D. Md.
    Oct. 31, 1990).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    We assume that the notice of appeal was timely filed in accordance with
    Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988)

    You might also like