Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Creech v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Eugene Creech appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on his post-conviction rehabilitation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the decision using the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 16, 1999 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-12-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7209

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eugene Creech appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on his post-conviction rehabilitation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the decision using the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 16, 1999 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Creech v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eugene Creech appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction based on his post-conviction rehabilitation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed the decision using the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 16, 1999 ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7209

    EUGENE CREECH, a/k/a Willie James McCoullough,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-160-3-MJP)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 1999

    Decided:

    December 29, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Eugene Creech, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene Creech appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion for sentence reduction on the basis of his post-conviction
    rehabilitation.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we af-

    firm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Creech v. United

    States, No. CA-94-160-3-MJP (D.S.C. Aug. 16, 1999).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like