Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Emodi, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Nnamdi Emodi's motion for modification of his prison term. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no merit to Emodi's appeal. It affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's October 25, 1995 order denying Emodi's motion. The appellate panel found oral arguments unnecessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Nnamdi Emodi's motion for modification of his prison term. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no merit to Emodi's appeal. It affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's October 25, 1995 order denying Emodi's motion. The appellate panel found oral arguments unnecessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Emodi, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Nnamdi Emodi's motion for modification of his prison term. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no merit to Emodi's appeal. It affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's October 25, 1995 order denying Emodi's motion. The appellate panel found oral arguments unnecessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7863

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    NNAMDI AZUBIKE EMODI, a/k/a Tony,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CR-91-36-D)
    Submitted:

    March 26, 1996

    Decided:

    April 4, 1996

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nnamdi Azubike Emodi, Appellant Pro Se.
    David Bernard Smith,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    "Motion for Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment." Our
    review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses
    that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Emodi, No. CR-9136-D (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like