Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Karnezis, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Arthur D. Karnezis. The court had reviewed Karnezis' motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-94-158 and CA-01-266-2.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Karnezis, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Arthur D. Karnezis. The court had reviewed Karnezis' motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-94-158 and CA-01-266-2.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6727

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Arthur D. Karnezis. The court had reviewed Karnezis' motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-94-158 and CA-01-266-2.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Karnezis, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Arthur D. Karnezis. The court had reviewed Karnezis' motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of that motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case numbers CR-94-158 and CA-01-266-2.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6727

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ARTHUR D. KARNEZIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
    (CR-94-158, CA-01-266-2)

    Submitted:

    July 26, 2001

    Decided:

    August 2, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Arthur D. Karnezis, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Arthur D. Karnezis appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States

    v. Karnezis, Nos. CR-94-158; Ca-01-266-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2001).


    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like