Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Seals v. City of Wheeling, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by G. Mark Seals under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including the City of Wheeling, West Virginia police officers, and government entities. The district court denied relief to Seals and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The three-judge panel dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-04-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-2356

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by G. Mark Seals under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including the City of Wheeling, West Virginia police officers, and government entities. The district court denied relief to Seals and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The three-judge panel dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views3 pages

    Seals v. City of Wheeling, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by G. Mark Seals under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including the City of Wheeling, West Virginia police officers, and government entities. The district court denied relief to Seals and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The three-judge panel dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-2356

    G. MARK SEALS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF WHEELING, West Virginia, as a
    municipal corporation; JOSEPH PETRI, former
    Wheeling Police Chief, individually and in
    official capacity; THOMAS MILLER, Wheeling
    Police Officer, individually and in official
    capacity;
    JOHN
    DANIEL,
    Wheeling
    Police
    Sergeant,
    individually
    and
    in
    official
    capacity; TARIS FARABEE, Wheeling Police
    Officer,
    individually
    and
    in
    official
    capacity; JOHN DOE, One or more un-named,
    individually and for officially sanctioned
    actions; LAW ENFORCEMENT, any unidentified law
    enforcement personnel, individually and in
    official capacities; MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER OF
    PEPPER SPRAY, identity of corporation to be
    determined and for officially sanctioned
    actions; ODGEN NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATED, a
    West Virginia Corporation and for officially
    sanctioned
    actions;
    OHIO
    COUNTY,
    WEST
    VIRGINIA,
    a
    West
    Virginia
    political
    subdivision for declaratory and injunctive
    relief only; SCOTT SMITH, The Honorable, Ohio
    County Prosecuting Attorney, for declaratory
    and injunctive relief only; STATE OF WEST
    VIRGINIA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-02-68-5)

    Submitted:

    March 31, 2004

    Decided:

    April 13, 2004

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    G. Mark Seals, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    G.

    Mark

    Seals

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Seals v. City of

    Wheeling, No. CA-02-68-5 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2003).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like