Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shapiro v. City VA Beach Central Library, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Josh Shapiro's appeal of a district court order dismissing his civil complaint against the City of Virginia Beach Central Library. The district court had dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Shapiro's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it on the same reasoning as the district court. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1689

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Josh Shapiro's appeal of a district court order dismissing his civil complaint against the City of Virginia Beach Central Library. The district court had dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Shapiro's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it on the same reasoning as the district court. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Shapiro v. City VA Beach Central Library, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Josh Shapiro's appeal of a district court order dismissing his civil complaint against the City of Virginia Beach Central Library. The district court had dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Shapiro's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it on the same reasoning as the district court. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1689

    JOSH SHAPIRO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH CENTRAL LIBRARY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:06-cv-00280-JBF)

    Submitted: October 17, 2006

    Decided: October 19, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Josh Shapiro, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Josh
    dismissing

    his

    Shapiro
    civil

    1915(e) (2000).

    appeals

    complaint

    frivolous

    courts
    under

    28

    order
    U.S.C.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

    reasoning of the district court.


    Central

    as

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find that the

    appeal is frivolous.

    Beach

    the

    Library,

    No.

    See Shapiro v. City of Virginia

    2:06-cv-00280-JBF

    June 7, 2006 & entered June 9, 2006).

    (E.D.

    Va.

    filed

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid in the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like