Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Martin, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Lorenzo Grode Martin appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials. The court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding legal precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-11-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7034

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lorenzo Grode Martin appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials. The court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Martin, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lorenzo Grode Martin appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. The court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials. The court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7034

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LORENZO GRODE MARTIN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District
    Judge. (1:00-cr-00226-TSE)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2006

    Decided:

    November 30, 2006

    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lorenzo Grode Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lorenzo Grode Martin appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for a reduction in sentence.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Martin, No. 1:00-cr-00226-TSE (E.D. Va. May 23, 2006). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like