Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Jafari v. Good, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Emmett Johnson Jafari's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction to hear Jafari's case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jafari v. Good, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Emmett Johnson Jafari's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction to hear Jafari's case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1088

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Emmett Johnson Jafari's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction to hear Jafari's case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Jafari v. Good, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Emmett Johnson Jafari's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction to hear Jafari's case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1088

    EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN RUSSELL GOOD, M.D.; MCGUIRE, WOODS,
    BATTLE & BOOTHE; MARY M.H. PRIDDY, Esquire;
    THOMAS J. MARKOW, Chief Judge, Circuit Court
    of the City of Richmond,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-96-825)
    Submitted:

    March 13, 1997

    Decided:

    March 20, 1997

    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Emmett Johnson Jafari, Appellant Pro Se. Anisa Patrice Kelley,
    FISCELLA, KELLEY & MOONEY, Richmond, Virginia; Franklin Brawner
    Greer, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia;
    Alice Ann Berkebile, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
    civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Jafari v. Good, No. CA-96-825 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like