Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hidalgo v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Israel Hidalgo, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 which was dismissed by the district court upon accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 2) Hidalgo appealed the district court's dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 21, 2002 order, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7898

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Israel Hidalgo, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 which was dismissed by the district court upon accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 2) Hidalgo appealed the district court's dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 21, 2002 order, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Hidalgo v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Israel Hidalgo, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 which was dismissed by the district court upon accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 2) Hidalgo appealed the district court's dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 21, 2002 order, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7898

    ISRAEL HIDALGO,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAN DOVE, Warden
    Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-02-2242)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2003

    Decided:

    February 5, 2003

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Israel Hidalgo, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Israel Hidalgo, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
    and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000). We
    have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hidalgo
    v.

    United

    States,

    No.

    CA-02-2242

    (D.S.C.

    Nov.

    21,

    2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like