Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ndiaye v. Mukasey, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Nafi Ndiaye's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her motion to reopen and reconsider an order of removal. The Court found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the Court. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding they would not aid the decision. The petition for review was denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-06-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1771

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Nafi Ndiaye's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her motion to reopen and reconsider an order of removal. The Court found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the Court. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding they would not aid the decision. The petition for review was denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Ndiaye v. Mukasey, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Nafi Ndiaye's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her motion to reopen and reconsider an order of removal. The Court found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the Court. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding they would not aid the decision. The petition for review was denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1771

    NAFI NDIAYE,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals.

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2008

    Decided:

    June 19, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,


    Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant
    Attorney General, Michael P. Lindemann, Assistant Director, Ethan
    B. Kanter, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nafi

    Ndiaye,

    native

    and

    citizen

    of

    Mauritania,

    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the Boards order and find that the
    Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ndiayes motion. See
    8 C.F.R. 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
    review for the reasons stated by the Board.

    See In Re: Ndiaye

    (B.I.A. July 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like