Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eddie Pittman v. Archer Western Contractors, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Eddie Pittman appealed a district court order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated, which were that Pittman's complaint failed to state a claim. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-2411

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eddie Pittman appealed a district court order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated, which were that Pittman's complaint failed to state a claim. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Eddie Pittman v. Archer Western Contractors, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eddie Pittman appealed a district court order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated, which were that Pittman's complaint failed to state a claim. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-2411

    EDDIE LAREECE PITTMAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ARCHER WESTERN
    CAMPBELL,

    CONTRACTORS;

    JOHN

    B.

    MCCUBBIN;

    REGGINALD

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:11-cv-00556-MAC-DSC)

    Submitted:

    April 26, 2012

    Decided:

    April 30, 2012

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eddie LaReece Pittman, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eddie
    order

    LaReece

    dismissing

    his

    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.

    Pittman
    civil

    appeals

    the

    complaint

    district

    under

    28

    courts
    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    3:11-cv-00556-MOC-DSC

    Pittman v. Archer W. Contractors, No.

    (W.D.N.C.

    Nov.

    28,

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like