Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Jadali v. Alamance Regional, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2005. It states that Fayegh Jadali appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action against Alamance Regional Medical Center. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jadali v. Alamance Regional, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2005. It states that Fayegh Jadali appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action against Alamance Regional Medical Center. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-02-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-2191

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2005. It states that Fayegh Jadali appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action against Alamance Regional Medical Center. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Jadali v. Alamance Regional, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2005. It states that Fayegh Jadali appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil action against Alamance Regional Medical Center. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-2191

    FAYEGH JADALI, M.D., Ph.D,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,
    INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District


    District of North Carolina, at Durham.
    District Judge. (CA-04-214-1)

    Submitted: February 16, 2006

    Court for the Middle


    James A. Beaty, Jr.,

    Decided: February 21, 2006

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Fayegh Jadali, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Douglas Dellinger,


    OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Fayegh

    Jadali

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing


    his civil action.
    reversible error.
    district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find no


    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    See Jadali v. Alamance Regional Med. Ctr., Inc.,

    No. CA-04-214-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like