Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sewraz v. Guice, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Chetanand Kumar Sewraz's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8173

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Chetanand Kumar Sewraz's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Sewraz v. Guice, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Chetanand Kumar Sewraz's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8173

    CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    EDWARD GUICE, Lieutenant; SCOTT BAILEY, Detective; KATHERINE
    ATKINS,
    Evidence
    Technician;
    DARRIN
    EDWARD
    BROMSETH,
    Detective; CRAIG BROWN, Detective; JODY BRUNNER, Detective;
    JUANAMETTRE
    BUTLER,
    Officer;
    FRANK
    CARPENTER;
    JESSICA
    CHAMER, Evidence Technician,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:08-cv-00035-RLW)

    Submitted:

    March 17, 2009

    Decided:

    March 20, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chetanand Kumar Sewraz, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Chetanand

    Kumar

    Sewraz

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint without


    prejudice.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Sewraz v. Guice, No. 3:08-cv-00035-RLW (E.D.

    Va. Aug. 26, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like