Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Moses Carter, JR., 979 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Moses Carter Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, finding that Carter's appeal was without merit based on the record and reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Carter's request for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Moses Carter, JR., 979 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Moses Carter Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, finding that Carter's appeal was without merit based on the record and reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Carter's request for relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 979 F.2d 849 Docket: 92-6969

    Original Title

    United States v. Moses Carter, Jr., 979 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Moses Carter Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, finding that Carter's appeal was without merit based on the record and reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Carter's request for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Moses Carter, JR., 979 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Moses Carter Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, finding that Carter's appeal was without merit based on the record and reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Carter's request for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    979 F.

    2d 849

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Moses CARTER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 92-6969.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 26, 1992
    Decided: November 18, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore.
    Moses Carter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellee.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Moses Carter, Jr., appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28
    U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the

    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Carter, Nos. CR-90-180-R, CA92-2389-R (D. Md. Aug. 28, 1992. We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like